Skip to content

fix: clean up code #21

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2025
Merged

fix: clean up code #21

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2025

Conversation

@WSQS
Copy link
Owner

@WSQS WSQS commented Nov 14, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified internal graphics pipeline initialization while maintaining existing functionality for shader editing and rendering.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request simplifies the graphics pipeline initialization in main.cpp by removing explicit SDL GPU pipeline configuration scaffolding, including shader compiler setup and manual vertex input/color target descriptions. The functionality is consolidated through a wrapper-based pipeline handling approach while retaining core window creation and shader assignment logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Graphics Pipeline Simplification
main.cpp		 Removed explicit SDL_GPUGraphicsPipeline creation and configuration scaffolding including shaderc::Compiler, shaderc::CompileOptions, and manual vertex/color target descriptions. Retained window creation, GPU wrapper association, shader assignment, and pipeline submission while delegating pipeline initialization to wrapper abstraction.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify that wrapper abstraction correctly encapsulates all removed pipeline configuration logic
  • Confirm shader assignment and pipeline submission remain functionally equivalent
  • Check that no shader compilation or vertex input specification is inadvertently skipped

Possibly related PRs

  • GL Edit #6: Introduces class-based graphicsPipeline member and pipeline setup logic—inverse direction compared to this PR's simplification and wrapper-based approach.

Poem

🐰 A pipeline, once tangled and tall,
Now wrapped up and simplified for all,
No compilers to fuss, no configs to call,
Just trust in the wrapper—the simplest of all! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix: clean up code' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't convey meaningful information about the specific changes. Replace with a more specific title that describes the actual change, such as 'refactor: simplify GPU pipeline initialization by removing explicit pipeline creation' to better reflect the substantive refactoring work.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch cleanup-code
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91cbc28 and cbb1d96.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • main.cpp (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings 
Learnt from: WSQS
Repo: WSQS/sdl_test PR: 7
File: sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx:73-76
Timestamp: 2025-11-14T00:45:09.377Z
Learning: In sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx, validation for m_window in the GpuWrapper::get_texture_formate() method (checking if m_window is nullptr before calling SDL_GetGPUSwapchainTextureFormat) is deferred to a future window wrapper implementation and should not be flagged in reviews.

Learnt from: WSQS
Repo: WSQS/sdl_test PR: 7
File: sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx:37-43
Timestamp: 2025-11-13T11:35:48.273Z
Learning: In sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx, null pointer validation for the GpuWrapper::create_buffer method (checking m_device, SDL_CreateGPUBuffer return value, and shared_from_this() validity) is deferred to a future issue and should not be flagged in reviews.

Learnt from: WSQS
Repo: WSQS/sdl_test PR: 7
File: sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.buffer.ixx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-13T11:34:32.714Z
Learning: In sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.buffer.ixx, null pointer validation for the BufferWrapper constructor (checking p_gpu, p_gpu->data(), and SDL_CreateGPUBuffer return value) is deferred to a future issue and should not be flagged in reviews.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-14T00:45:09.377Z 
Learnt from: WSQS
Repo: WSQS/sdl_test PR: 7
File: sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx:73-76
Timestamp: 2025-11-14T00:45:09.377Z
Learning: In sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx, validation for m_window in the GpuWrapper::get_texture_formate() method (checking if m_window is nullptr before calling SDL_GetGPUSwapchainTextureFormat) is deferred to a future window wrapper implementation and should not be flagged in reviews.

Applied to files:

  • main.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-11-13T11:35:48.273Z 
Learnt from: WSQS
Repo: WSQS/sdl_test PR: 7
File: sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx:37-43
Timestamp: 2025-11-13T11:35:48.273Z
Learning: In sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.gpu.ixx, null pointer validation for the GpuWrapper::create_buffer method (checking m_device, SDL_CreateGPUBuffer return value, and shared_from_this() validity) is deferred to a future issue and should not be flagged in reviews.

Applied to files:

  • main.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-11-13T11:34:32.714Z 
Learnt from: WSQS
Repo: WSQS/sdl_test PR: 7
File: sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.buffer.ixx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-13T11:34:32.714Z
Learning: In sdl_wrapper/sdl_wrapper.buffer.ixx, null pointer validation for the BufferWrapper constructor (checking p_gpu, p_gpu->data(), and SDL_CreateGPUBuffer return value) is deferred to a future issue and should not be flagged in reviews.

Applied to files:

  • main.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Debug, cl)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Debug, gcc)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Debug, clang)
  • GitHub Check: build (Release, clang)
  • GitHub Check: build (Release, gcc)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Release, cl)
  • GitHub Check: build (Debug, clang)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Release, clang)
  • GitHub Check: build (Debug, gcc)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, Release, gcc)
  • GitHub Check: clang-tidy-review
🔇 Additional comments (1)
main.cpp (1)

81-85: LGTM! Clean refactoring to wrapper-based pipeline management.

The simplified pipeline initialization successfully moves configuration complexity into PipelineWrapper, making the code more maintainable. The wrapper pattern properly encapsulates shader compilation and pipeline creation details.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@deepsource-io
Copy link
Contributor

deepsource-io bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 91cbc28..cbb1d96. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource C & C++ LogoC & C++❌ Failure
❗ 6 occurences introduced
🎯 94 occurences resolved
View Check ↗
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@WSQS WSQS merged commit aa3f4f1 into dev Nov 14, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@WSQS WSQS deleted the cleanup-code branch November 14, 2025 03:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@WSQS @Sophomore42